AI in Judicial Chambers: Are We Ready for Tech-Assisted Judges?
As a jurist dedicated to modernizing the justice system, I have long championed the thoughtful integration of technology into our courts. Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have created opportunities to enhance judicial efficiency and decision-making. However, a fundamental question remains: Is the public prepared to embrace AI as a tool in judicial chambers and courtrooms?
This discussion is not about replacing judges or delegating decision-making to machines. Instead, it concerns using AI as a sophisticated assistant—akin to a highly skilled law clerk. AI could augment judicial capabilities in several ways, such as:
Conducting legal research and analyzing case law
Drafting preliminary versions of judicial opinions based on judicial guidance
Summarizing complex legal documents
Providing real-time recommendations on evidentiary rulings
These AI-assisted functions could significantly improve judicial efficiency and consistency. Yet, the question remains: Are we, as a society, ready for this transformation? Procedural justice—the principle that the integrity of the decision-making process is as vital as the outcome—is key to maintaining public trust in the justice system. This principle underscores the challenge we face.
Public perceptions of AI are often influenced by sensationalized portrayals in the media. The notion of a judge relying on AI, even as a supportive tool, may provoke apprehension. The human element of justice—the belief that an experienced judge is carefully considering all aspects of a case—is deeply ingrained in public consciousness.
Consider a scenario where a litigant loses their case. It is one matter for them to think, "Judge Schlegel made an error." It is entirely different for them to wonder, "Would I have prevailed if Judge Schlegel had used a different AI tool, such as ChatGPT instead of Claude?" Such shifts in thinking could undermine confidence in the judicial process if not carefully managed.
However, as the public becomes more familiar with AI in their daily lives, acceptance of its role in the legal system may grow. As individuals interact with AI-powered tools—whether through virtual assistants or customer service interfaces—the concept of AI-augmented judges may become more familiar and acceptable.
Furthermore, as major technology companies add AI features to word processing tools, judges will naturally begin experimenting with these tools, even if only initially for revising and editing purposes. This gradual introduction may ease the transition and foster greater public acceptance of AI in chambers, while helping the public understand that AI is meant to augment, not replace, judicial wisdom. AI is merely a tool, not a decision-maker. The judge's role in exercising empathy, understanding context, and rendering judgments remains irreplaceable. AI can provide judges with enhanced insights and efficiencies without encroaching on their authority.
In conclusion, while the technology exists and some judges are ready to use AI responsibly, substantial work remains in preparing the public for this transition. Integrating AI into judicial chambers and courtrooms is inevitable. To ensure its success and preserve public trust though, it is crucial to engage the public in this journey. AI in the judiciary must enhance public confidence in the administration of justice through technological innovation, public engagement, and education. And State Supreme Courts should consider implementing pilot programs to gradually introduce AI tools, allowing time for technology refinement, judicial training, and public acclimation.
By taking a measured approach to AI integration in chambers, we can create a future where technology enhances—rather than replaces—the wisdom and discretion that underpin a fair and equitable legal system. As AI becomes more embedded in daily life, the public may come to not only accept but expect its thoughtful application in the pursuit of justice.
Subscribe to my Substack newsletter today so you don’t miss out on a post. https://judgeschlegel.substack.com
