Breaking Barriers: Modernizing Justice and the 4-Minute Mile
In the world of track and field, May 6, 1954, stands as a watershed moment. On that day, Roger Bannister did what many thought impossible: he ran a mile in under four minutes. This feat, long considered beyond human capability, shattered more than just a record—it broke through a psychological barrier that had held back athletes for generations.
As a judge deeply invested in modernizing our justice system, I often reflect on Bannister's achievement. The parallels between his historic run and our efforts to revolutionize the courts are striking and instructive. Just as the 4-minute mile was once deemed an insurmountable obstacle, many view the comprehensive modernization of our justice system as an unattainable goal. Budget constraints, technological hurdles, and the weight of tradition have long been cited as reasons why significant change is impossible.
However, Bannister's success wasn't just about physical prowess—it was about believing in the possibility of change. Similarly, our journey to modernize the courts begins with the conviction that improvement is not only possible but necessary. We must first believe that we can create a more efficient, effective, and accessible justice system before we can make it a reality.
Of course, Bannister didn't suddenly wake up one day able to run a sub-4-minute mile. His achievement was the result of meticulous planning, incremental improvements, and relentless practice. In the same vein, our approach to court modernization focuses on implementing small, manageable changes that compound over time. For instance, in my own court, we introduced online calendaring systems that reduced failures-to-appear, cut scheduling conflicts and allowed us to stagger our dockets properly. We also implemented a user-friendly court website that decreased phone inquiries, freeing up staff time for more complex tasks.
These simple improvements, while significant, are just the beginning. Like Bannister's revolutionary training methods, courts around the country are beginning to pilot AI-powered legal research tools that can analyze vast amounts of documents and case law in seconds, potentially reducing preparation time for judges and lawyers.
However, we must acknowledge that this journey is not without its skeptics and challenges. Concerns about cybersecurity, the digital divide, and the potential loss of human touch in legal proceedings are valid and require thoughtful solutions. To address these, we must invest in robust security measures, implement digital literacy programs, and ensure that modernization efforts complement rather than replace human judgment and empathy in the legal process.
Interestingly, within weeks of Bannister’s historic run, other athletes began to break the four-minute barrier. Once it was proven possible, the psychological limitations lifted for many. I believe we’re on the cusp of a similar phenomenon in legal technology. As more courts successfully implement modern solutions, others will follow suit, accelerating the pace of change across the entire system. We saw this happen when the pandemic struck. Courts that never imagined going virtual, quickly adapted, and did so in a matter of weeks once they saw it was possible. The pandemic proved that rapid, widespread change in court operations is not only possible but sometimes necessary, much like Bannister’s run proved the four-minute mile barrier could be broken. This modernization isn’t just about making judges’ lives easier—it benefits all stakeholders in the justice system. For lawyers, digital case management systems and e-filing reduce administrative burdens, allowing more time for substantive legal work. Litigants benefit from improved access to legal information and more efficient case processing. And the general public gains from increased transparency and accessibility of court proceedings.
While we've made significant strides, we haven't yet had our "4-minute mile" moment—that tipping point where the floodgates of innovation burst open across all jurisdictions. But we're getting closer every day. Emerging technologies like AI-driven transcription, advanced case management and e-filing systems, and virtual self-help desks manned by AI agents are on the horizon, promising to revolutionize the justice system further.
To reach this tipping point though, we need engagement from all corners of the legal community and beyond. Lawyers can advocate for and adopt new technologies in their practices. Court administrators can pilot innovative programs and share best practices. Technologists can collaborate with legal professionals to design solutions tailored to the unique needs of the justice system. And the public can support and participate in these modernization efforts, providing valuable feedback and pushing for continued progress.
Like Bannister, we must keep pushing forward, undeterred by those who say it can't be done. The future of our justice system—more accessible, efficient, and effective than ever before—is worth the effort. And when we finally break through, the impact will resonate for generations to come.
The race to modernize our justice system is not a sprint but a marathon. Yet, with each step forward, we're not just breaking records—we're breaking down barriers to justice. Just as Bannister's achievement inspired a generation of athletes to push their limits, our efforts today will pave the way for a modern justice system tomorrow. The finish line may not be in sight yet, but with continued innovation, collaboration, and determination, we will get there, one milestone at a time.
Subscribe to my Substack newsletter today so you don’t miss out on a post. https://judgeschlegel.substack.com
