New Voices: An AI Writing Experiment
As most of you are aware, I use ChatGPT to assist in composing articles for this newsletter on legal technology. But in an effort to explore different perspectives and capabilities within the AI landscape, I will be expanding my use of LLMs to include platforms such as the most up-to-date version of Claude. This shift will allow us to experience different "voices" in our ongoing discussion of technology's role in the legal system.
As a sitting judge with extensive experience in legal tech and the justice system, I've chosen to employ these GenAI tools for article composition primarily due to time. These AI assistants serve as valuable tools, allowing me to scale myself and share knowledge more efficiently while maintaining focus on my core judicial responsibilities.
It is imperative to draw a clear distinction between the use of AI in crafting these informational articles though, and my current position that they should not be used to draft judicial opinions. Judicial opinions require my authentic voice, reasoning, and judgment. As a judge, I bear the sole responsibility for these decisions. The opinions I write serve as precedent, potentially shaping the course of justice for years to come. They embody my years of legal experience, understanding of the law, and commitment to ensuring justice for all. This is a responsibility I do not and will not delegate to AI.
These articles, conversely, serve an educational and informative purpose. They are designed to spark discussion, share insights, and demonstrate the potential for modernization within our justice system. While the core ideas and expertise conveyed in these articles are unequivocally mine, the AI assists in articulating these concepts more efficiently and effectively.
You may notice subtle variations in writing style as we experiment with different AI platforms. This diversity in expression aligns with the multifaceted nature of the legal tech landscape we explore. And who knows, by the end of this experiment, I might even find a way to design or use an LLM that captures “my voice” every time.
But here's something crucial to remember: technology changes rapidly, and we must all remain open as it advances. The opinions I share today may shift as we learn more and as these tools evolve. However, as a jurist and leader within the judiciary, my primary responsibility will always be to maintain fidelity to the law and the justice system.
I'm really looking forward to this new chapter in our legal tech journey together. As always, I'd love to hear what you think. Your thoughts and feedback make this newsletter what it is.
Until next time, let's keep pushing the boundaries of what's possible in our courts!
